Tag: Christian (Page 2 of 7)

Spiritual Grooming: Culture that Enables Spiritual Harm & Abuse – Pt. 1  

man in white suit standing on street
Photo by David Henry on Pexels.com

Over that last year, there have been numerous accounts of Christian leaders and pastors being involved in morally reprehensible abuses. Stories like Jerry Falwell Jr’s sex scandal and abusive university policies and practices, Mark Discoll’s continued bullying and unrepentant behavior, John MacArthur’s hiring and continued support of multiple pedophiles, and even Hillsong Church founder Brian Houston’s accusations of failing to report abuse and subsequent misconduct are all examples of what can happen when unchecked and unrestrained power become central to a religious institution.

On the surface, these events seem like worse-case scenarios, mainly confined to high-profile leaders with massive churches and platforms. To a large degree, pastors in that setting are more prone to these scandals. However, in May 2022, Guidepost Solutions issued a detailed report stating that the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) had compiled a list of 700 pastors who had been reported for varying degrees of sexual abuse over a 20-year period.

That report clarifies that this is not a “megachurch” or celebrity pastor issue. And while there seems to be an ever-growing trail of victims, my biggest question is: How is this happening? How are Christian leaders ignoring this? How have we not condemned and moved to correct this devastating issue? While many factors exist that enable this kind of abuse and make victims reluctant to report it, the spiritual element complicates the issue. While complicated, a specific rising trend within the American Evangelical Industrial Complex feeds that complexity.

“Groomers”

“Grooming” has recently become an increasingly common part of the modern American Christian lexicon. Unfortunately, its use is incorrect, unhealthy, and exaggerated, only compounding this problematic addition. The most common use of the term that I observe is as a means of expressing disgust with the Queer community, particularly with Transgender issues and toward the entertainment medium known as “drag.” Of the many issues I have with Christians hijacking this word, my primary frustrations have to do with their clear misunderstanding of the term, how its misuse diminishes the seriousness of it, and how it has been unjustly and irrationally applied to an entire group of people.



RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network) identifies grooming as “a tool, used by abusers, of manipulative behaviors used to gain access to a potential victim, coerce them to agree to the abuse and reduce the risk of being caught. While these tactics are used most often against younger kids, teens, and vulnerable adults are also at risk.” This typically takes the form of “building a relationship, trust, and emotional connection with a child or young person so they can manipulate, exploit and abuse them.

Based on this definition, grooming is not occurring in the Transgender community. Neither does it happen during drag show performances or events like library drag story time. I’m not saying that there aren’t individual abusers who are Transgender or drag performers. But, identifying a whole community or all performers as “groomers” reveals a profound misunderstanding of this tool of abuse, the Transgender community, and drag as entertainment. It also reveals your implicit rejection of an entire people group as divine image bearers and a willful refusal to understand the issue in a nuanced way.

Real Grooming

Alternatively, we do see, in the previously mentioned examples, literal and rampant grooming and sexual abuse within the Church. We see Christian leaders and pastors, typically straight white men, building trusting relationships and then perpetrating horrible abuse. While 700 pastors over 20 years may not seem like a lot, this is one report about one denomination and doesn’t consider the over 400,000 clergies in America. It also does not account for the statistically significant 63% of abuse cases that go unreported.

That means, considering those 700 cases, more than 1,200 other cases potentially went unreported to the SBC. Those numbers don’t even account for other denominations that have reported and unreported cases (think of the Catholic church, Presbyterian Church, Mennonite Church, LDS, or the 30,000 other denominations that exist). This also ignores that other pastors may have been aware of the abuse and did nothing. That knowledge and failure to act automatically make them complicit in the abuse. It also doesn’t account for additional victims who may never come forward. And this only considers sexual abuse and rape.

Calling All Pastors

To be clear, I’m not only, or even primarily, addressing sexual abuse in the church. I want to speak more broadly to other, sometimes less obvious, spiritual abuse and harm that causes religious trauma. This includes the seemingly harmless, and often presented as good, teachings about authority and submission. Often, these teachings bear many of the same elements and results as grooming. For this series of posts, I’ll refer to these teachings and the culture they produce as spiritual grooming. To clarify what I mean when I reference spiritual grooming, this is my working definition: Spiritual Grooming is a manipulative process used by spiritual leaders or those in positions of spiritual authority to exploit their influence over an individual. This process involves building trust, emotional connection, and dependence on spiritual guidance in a way that makes the individual vulnerable to abuse, control, or harm. Spiritual grooming can occur knowingly or unknowingly and often blurs the lines between spiritual care and exploitation. It creates a power dynamic where the individual may feel obligated to submit to harmful behaviors under the guise of spiritual obedience or faithfulness, making it difficult for them to recognize or resist abuse. Additionally, we’ll define spiritual abuse and harm as “when someone uses spiritual or religious beliefs to hurt, scare or control another person.”  

Because abuse within the Church is serious and widespread, we need to understand the problem in a nuanced way. We also need to find ways to take urgent action. The Guidepost Solutions report makes clear that Christian leaders can no longer dismiss the prevalence of abuse within the Church. Pastors must understand how the implicit trust connected to their position creates fertile ground for abuse and harm. In realizing this, they must reconsider how and what they teach regarding authority and submission. In the following blog posts, we’ll explore the issue deeper and consider some ways forward.

This is part three in a three-part series on spiritual grooming, harm, and abuse. You can read parts two HERE and three HERE.

Lent 2021: A Call for the American Church to Lament and Repent

Starting on Ash Wednesday (February 17, 2021) we will enter a time of lament and repentance. Our lament will be over the church’s complicity in a range of issues (sins) that have caused so much hurt. They’ve also negatively impacted our ability to witness to a world desperately in need of Jesus.

Something New, but Old

Because lament and repentance are not typically regular practices, for us as a Church, it is beneficial to be specific about the purpose of this week. Specifically, as we intentionally position ourselves in a posture of lament we will be moved toward the act of repentance. This is often difficult for us, both individually and communally, for two reasons. The first is because lament, or grieving, is hard and we make many attempts to avoid it. Because of that, we’ve not made lament a part of the discipleship or taught what it means to grieve well. The second is because we have largely misunderstood what repentance is, again, both individually and communally.

There was a time that I assumed that repentance meant that I had to take responsibility for whatever the sin was as if I had actually done it or participated in it. For example, the church has a long and well documented complicity in racism and racist practices.

I would look at the issue and the church’s involvement and assume that repentance meant that I had to admit to personal racist behavior. I would try to process that idea and really struggle with the implication that I needed to take responsibility for something I didn’t actually do. I’m sure that I have situations in my life that involved unintentional actions that were, at the very least, racially insensitive. But, racist? Absolutely not. For me, the focus became about intention and I would never intentionally treat someone different because of their skin color. In my mind, I couldn’t align the idea of historic complicity with my own lack of personal intent.

Gaining Understanding

At the same time, I would struggle with the biblical principle of communal repentance, shown in Israel’s repentance for the previous generation’s sins, even though they had not participated in that particular sin. After years of prayer, counsel, and study, I’ve come to understand the real intent of repentance. Before we continue, it will be helpful to define some key terms.

Complicity: the state of being an accomplice or in partnership or involvement in wrongdoing. In the context of the issues presented over the coming weeks, complicity means either intentional participation in and/or compromising in those areas by making shameful concessions.

Lament: the dictionary definition is “to feel or express sorrow or regret for something.” However, it’s more than that and uniquely Christian. Biblical lament is first, and foremost, a prayer. But not any prayer, it is a prayer that is directly focused on expressing fear, regret, and sorrow to God and communicating, to Him, our desire for restoration and renewal. Specifically, restoration of our connection to Him and renewal of our mind to His way of thinking.

Repentance: Again, the dictionary definition is, a deep sorrow, compunction, or contrition for a past sin, wrongdoing, or the like. However, this misses the nuances and intention of biblical repentance. Repentance is more specifically the intentional recognition of past wrongdoing, whether individual or communal, the decision to change your mind, and then act in a manner contrary to the act that prompted the need for repentance.

Toward Repentance

It is with these definitions and clarifications in mind that we are able to lament the Church’s complicity and compromise of these sins. Then we are able to approach them with “a broken and humbled heart” (Psalm 51:7) and understand that repentance is not about acknowledging direct responsibility for committing them (sometimes they might be), but rather an acknowledgment of their opposition to the Gospel of Jesus and our desire to change our minds about them and commit to actions that move the church in a direction opposite of the Church’s historical actions within that specific sins. In essence, it is a complete rejection of the previous intentional acts or beliefs, or passive allowance, and the deliberate move toward beliefs and actions that are Christ-honoring and people welcoming.

Before we move into repentance, we must first lament our past. Deep sorrow and grief are necessary for repentance and the vehicle by which the Holy Spirit moves us through conviction and into repentance.

Here are the issues we lament as a church and then seek repentance in:

  • Allowing Leaders unchecked and unaccountable power/authority (WK 1)
  • Complicity in Racial injustices (WK 2)
  • Misplaced Allegiance (Idolatry) (WK 3)
  • Christian Nationalism (WK 4)
  • Enemy Making (WK 5)
  • Turning Toward and Celebration (WK 6)

The Process

During each week (Mon – Fri) there will be daily issues presented for how these have played out in specific ways (i.e. Wk 1, Day 1 – Sexual Abuse).

Each week will feature:

  1. A Daily Reading
  2. A Reflective Question
  3. A weekly prayer
  4. A list of resources

The intention is to spend time in prayer and reflection to allow the Holy Spirit to guide you toward specific action in some or all of these areas. It’s important to understand that while we can begin to move God’s church away from each of these sins through individual action, we may feel God calling us to do work, on a communal scale, in one specific area. This is okay and not a rejection of the work needed in the other areas.

Toward Christ

It’s also important to remember that some of these issues may rub you the wrong way. You may feel the urge to reject the notion of complicity and the need for repentance. I urge you to still seek the Holy Spirit in these areas; remember that repentance is not an admission of responsibility for committing these sins. Instead, it is a commitment to and taking responsibility for the renewing of our minds in these areas. It’s our intentional act to move the church far in the opposite direction of them.

As we enter the last week of Lent, we will enter with a heart moved toward celebration. This will be a week of preparation and celebration for the coming Good Friday and Easter. We will celebrate the resurrection and promised return of our Good King, Jesus, who has defeated every one of these sins. This week also allows us to acknowledge that Jesus’s defeat of these sins is seen in our good works, He has prepared for us to do, in these areas. With that in mind, one of the primary purposes of this week is a commitment to action. Repentance is only as good as its ability to invoke action in the opposite direction of the repented of offense.

As we prepare for this next season, I’m praying for you; for us, as Jesus’s Church. This is how we usher heaven to earth. Let’s get to ushering.

You can download this as a PDF at the below link:

The daily readings, questions, and weekly prayer will be posted on my Instagram profile: @bpags2


Weekly Guides

Week of Lament (Starting Ash Wednesday to Feb 21)

Week 1 (Feb 22-26), Authority & Power

Week 2 (Mar 1-5), Complicity in Racial Injustices

Week 3 (Mar 8-12), Misplaced Allegiance (Idolatry)

Week 4 (Mar 15-19), Christian Nationalism

Week 5 (Mar 22-26), Enemy Making

Passion Week (Mar 29-Apr 2), Celebration

How Disney Played Christians like Gaston Played the Villagers

Gay LeFou

This past weekend Disney debuted their live-action version of the timeless classic, Beauty and the Beast, in theaters across the globe. The movie was so highly anticipated that it smashed the record for a March opening night with a staggering $170 million coming out… er, uh I mean, debut. And that’s to say nothing of the $350 million the movie earned worldwide (and, to be fair, I’m writing this on a Sunday afternoon, so that amount doesn’t even account for the whole weekend). And all that in the midst of a call by Evangelical Christian leaders, well one in particular, for Christians to kill the Beast.

Kill the Beast

The call to boycott the film came after Disney’s announcement of the inclusion of an “exclusively gay moment” involving Gaston’s sidekick, LeFou, played by Josh Gad. And what was this “gay” moment? Well, I haven’t seen the movie, yet, but my wife has. So, I know what it is and don’t want to spoil the surprise. I will say that the big gay moment was so subtle and quick, that if you leaned over to grab some of your neighbor’s popcorn, you would have missed it. But, that didn’t stop Christians from taking up pitchforks against the “happiest place on earth.” For me, the call to boycott, though I think it silly, isn’t the issue. My issue has to do with when the boycott was called for.

The announcement about LeFou’s moment was made on March 1st and the boycott was called for on March 3rd, more than two weeks before the movie opened. That is my issue. Christian leaders called for us to boycott a movie they had not seen and based on a, likely deliberately, vague announcement. When the movie premiered, this “moment” was literally a moment and so subtle that most of our kids wouldn’t have picked up on it. And, even though I have a huge problem with this latest “fall on our sword worthy” fight against Disney obviously trying to “corrupt” our children; the hypocrisy of that isn’t even the point of this post. If you want to read a great article in that vein, check out the one Jonathan Merritt wrote for USA Today.

We Got Played

Instead, I’d like to go another way and suggest that Disney played Christians, for their benefit, and we took the bait. What I mean is, Disney already had a ton of hype surrounding the release of this movie. A whole generation of adults could not wait to see their beloved cartoon brought to real life. They also couldn’t wait to share it with their children in a way that they never dreamed possible. People were going to see it no matter what. There was no reason Disney had to reveal any information about the “special moment.” They could have let it be surprise. Likely most people wouldn’t have noticed it. Those who did, without a Disney confirmation, would have just been stretching. So Disney didn’t need to release that, but they did. Why? Obviously I don’t know for sure, but based on Christians history, it is easy to speculate.

I think an obvious part of it is likely that they want the LBGTQ community to know they support them. I also think, based on how Christians have historically reacted to this type of news, Disney knew this would cause a firestorm and ignite a huge public debate. My news feed was certainly consumed with the movie tagged in statuses, news articles and blogs. To me it seemed as if Disney put out this vague announcement about some sort of “gay” moment and then sat back and watched the internet lose it. And the discussion spanned the whole spectrum, with people both praising and demonizing Disney for “normalizing” the lifestyle. But, while there were a lot of people happy to hear about the scene, the loudest voices came from Christians who were angry about it.

Boy, Oh Boy…cott

And that’s the point I want to make. We, as Christians, have become so predictable about how and what we will respond to negatively that we were played. And whether Disney did it on purpose or not doesn’t matter. In today’s social media driven culture everyone knows that any publicity is good publicity. Companies know that if you can get people talking about their product, most times it is a good thing. So Disney put out some vague statement and sat back and watched everyone talk about it. Ultimately the boycott did nothing. In fact, I actually heard people say that one of the reasons they wanted to see it more than they did before was to “see how far” Disney went with the scene. Then, when the movie premiered, the scene was so subtle it made Christians look ridiculous and the boycott even more so.

The truth is, the world will continue to move toward worldly things and we are not called to stop it. Jesus will when He returns. Our job, while we are here, is to be His witness to people, not governments or corporations. We are called to make individual disciples, not reorient constitutions and business strategy. Introducing people to Him changes heart and that will be what ushers in the Kingdom of God. I’m not saying not to boycott or protest, do it if you want to. I am saying it is a waste of time and energy if you want to follow Jesus the way He called us to. He called us to love and serve others in hopes that they may know and come to Him.

Boycotts won’t stop people from seeing the things we disagree with, but they may just stop them from seeing Jesus.

 

 

 

photo: Flickr/(LeFou)Jeff Kern and (Flag)torbakhopper (changes made to original images)

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 BrucePagano.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑